The front side (recto) of Papyrus 1, a New Testament manuscript of the Gospel of Matthew. Most likely originated in Egypt. Also part of the Oxyrhynchus Papyri (P. oxy. 2).
Dr. Bryant G. Wood recently presented lectures on “Archaeology and the Conquest: New Evidence on an Old Problem.” Wood is editor of Bible and Spade, and director of the Excavations at Khirbet el-Maqatir (suggested as a possible site for Biblical Ai). Four separate talks cover:
- Background and Chronology of the Exodus and Conquest
- Digging Up the Truth at Jericho
- The Discovery of Joshua’s Ai
- Great Archaeological Discoveries Related to the Old Testament
Alexander Pruss points to a new blog on the philosophy of cosmology.
Daniel Wallace and Bart Ehrman debate on the topic: “Is the original New Testament lost?”
A new article on “Platonism and Theism” is up at the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Alvin Plantinga lectures on “Religion and Science: Why Does the Debate Continue?” at Rainier Beach Presbyterian Church in Seattle Washington
Craig Blomberg writes on “Jesus of Nazareth: How Historians Can Know Him and Why It Matters” (PDF).
Peter S. Williams engages with the question “Can Moral Objectivism Do Without God?”
Some fascinating work here on Intelligent Design by Peter Williams, from the EPS blog.
Allow me to draw attention to this paper recently published on the EPS website:
‘Atheists Against Darwinism: Johnsons’ “Wedge” Breaks Through‘
Intelligent design theory claims that 1) empirical evidence warrants 2) a scientific design inference using 3) reliable design detection criteria. Philosophia Christi published my paper “The Design Inference from Specified Complexity Defended by Scholars Outside the Intelligent Design Movement: A Critical Review” (Philosophia Christi, Vol 9, Number 2), which defended the third of these claims by reviewing the work atheists and theistic evolutionists. This paper defends the second of these claims, likewise by reviewing work by agnostics and atheists.
Hence this paper rounds off a two-part defence of the philosophical elements of Intelligent Design Theory (claims 2 & 3), and does so in two phases. Phase one focuses upon the growing acceptance of Phillip E. Johnsons’ analysis of the role played by methodological naturalism in buttressing Darwinism, while phase two focuses upon Thomas Nagel’s positive interaction with Michael J. Behe’s argument in The Edge of Evolution (Free Press, 2008). I argue that Nagel’s reticence about embracing ID is philosophically inconsistent.