Philosophy Word of the Day – Counterfactual

A conditional statement whose antecedent [see below] is known (or, at least, believed) to be contrary to fact. Thus, for example, “If George W. Bush had been born in Idaho, then he would never have become President.”

Unlike material implications [see below], counterfactuals are not made true by the falsity of their antecedents. Although they are not truth-functional [see below] statements, counterfactuals may be significant for the analysis of scientific hypotheses.

[antecedent – The element that states the prior condition in any conditional statement. For example, “It doesn’t rain” is the antecedent in both

“If it doesn’t rain, then we’ll have a picnic.” and

“It will reach ninety degrees today if it doesn’t rain.”

In a true material implication, the truth of its antecedent is incompatible with the falsity of its consequent.]


[material implication – The logical relationship between any two propositions such that either the first is false or the second is true. See implication.]


[truth functional – A compound statement or connective is truth-functional if its truth or meaning is wholly determined by the possible combinations of truth-value of its component statements.]


(Via Philosophical Dictionary)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s