Philosophy Word of the Day – Cosmological Arguments

St Thomas Aquinas taught that raising prices i...
Image via Wikipedia

Cosmological arguments (from cosmos + logos: world + argument) are theistic arguments that have historically played an important role in natural theology.  The arguments attempt to infer from the existence of contingent (able to not exist) facts, events, or beings, “a first cause . . .  or a personal being (God).”

Since everything that exists depends for its existence on something else, and because this series of causes and effects can’t be infinite, the chain must end with something whose existence does not require an explanation.  Natural theologians argue that this is God.

Versions of the argument go back to Plato (Laws) and Aristotle (Physics and Metaphysics) and have been defended by Thomas Aquinas (1225-74), al-Ghāzāli (1058-1111), and Bonaventure (1221-74).

William Lane Craig distinguishes three different arguments under this umbrella, each with different emphases: the Leibnizian, the Thomist, and the kalam.

Notable critics have included David Hume and Immanuel Kant, and more recently Michael Martin, Quentin Smith, and Graham Oppy.

Modern proponents of various versions include Robert Koons, William Lane Craig, and Richard Swinburne.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Bookmark and Share


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s